« Counter Complacency and Gain Career Stability by Transforming your ED into a “Learning Organization.” | Main | The Joint is Coming. The Joint is Coming. »

Friday, March 15, 2002

Leadership Can Come out of Systems Thinking and Profound Knowledge.

Writing these words seems a rather empty act on a day in which our ED has been “up for grabs.” As I write in early January our average daily census is running at over 250 patients—our usual is about 215. We’re holding more than a dozen admitted patients almost every morning and some mornings more than two-dozen. So what’s new you ask? Isn’t everyone? Well, yes it seems that the season of ED congestion has rolled around once again as we all knew it would and yet here we are, not much different than we were one or two years ago. Isn’t that so for you too?

So, you might ask how could he write about leaders transforming their EDs into “learning organizations” as I did last month when obviously I haven’t learned much about managing overcrowding these past several years? Well, yes and no—isn’t life just like that?

Yes, like you, we at Maimonides have learned how to handle an ever-increasing census, indeed our adult acute area functions pretty well even with 45-50 patients receiving care though we have only 20 designated stretcher locations and six “asthma chairs.” By functioning pretty well I mean that patient throughput intervals don’t suffer and it seems as though our clinical events don’t spike. So, we’ve probably learned something about managing this kind of volume. However, when the in ED census goes beyond those 50, it’s then that we hit gridlock and become vulnerable to giving patients less attention: both compassion and clinical care may suffer. You face the same challenges.

Resource constrained as we all are, though you may get support from your hospital administration, it’s pretty hard for them to manufacture additional critical care beds when the census is already at 100+% so we all soldier on. Yet, both the direction and the level of the effort are growing. The efforts are taking place and come out of sound systems thinking.

Last month, in writing about Peter Senge’s The Fifth Discipline and the opportunity for transforming our ED into a learning organization, I briefly mentioned the five component technologies necessary to the creation of a learning organization: “systems thinking,” personal mastery (proficiency), mental models, building shared vision, and team learning. Of all of these skills, systems thinking probably comes easiest to an emergency physician, after all we think about EMS systems, trauma systems and multi-hospital systems.

In helping you grasp Senge’s technology of “systems thinking” I put forward what I learned from W. Edwards Deming as his system of “profound knowledge” which Deming described as consisting of four parts, all related to each other: appreciation for a system, knowledge about variation, theory of knowledge and psychology. Building through these tools, you as leader of your ED can address specific issues in ways that broaden everyone’s knowledge of the system within which they labor.

One large teaching hospital group had been laboring under the “gift package admission concept” (this leader obviously both appreciated the system for admissions and the psychology behind it) that required the emergency physicians to spend impossible energies and efforts at completing work ups on each patient before the patient would go off to a floor bed. This hospital and its ED have implemented rules that abort the workup at the point that the bed is ready; though they still labor under the delays caused by bed and consultant availability. The leader identified what in the system were the greatest contributors to admission delays and specifically tackled those problems, first. Other problems persist and must be worked through, but the group thought about the whole system, not just the ED—the “gift package admission concept” probably originating with a teaching service.

Perhaps you’ve implemented an intervention when you do hold many patients overnight. We have the laboratory come and draw the morning blood work and the heart station come and do the morning ECGs if we have more than ten admitted patients in the ED. The department of radiology, which usually only staffs with a single technician until 11:00 am, assigns additional technicians at 8:00 am. We saw that organizing the morning care for the admitted patients in the ED facilitated the patient’s early movement to beds as they became available. It reduced the load on an ED staff that tends to be a bit thin first thing in the morning and it reassures the patients that they were receiving the same care in the ED that they would have received up stairs. Then on other days, just yesterday for instance, we see 268 patients and yet this morning we only have four patients awaiting bed assignment. Why? Perhaps because there were many discharges yesterday, Sunday, so that all of our admissions could be accommodated.

Building a mental model that incorporates the effects of the magnitude of the same day’s discharges on ED throughput and admitted patient holding time is another technique readily accessible to the emergency physician, but often we lack sufficient knowledge to create an accurate mental representation of reality. How many of you know all the details of the bed assignment in your hospital or the time of day when the patients actually leave their beds to go home? Yet, if you want to address the movement of patients from the ED to the inpatient nursing units through systems thinking based on a realistic mental model, you must learn what presently exists. I’ve previously discussed interdisciplinary teamwork and collaboration (May 2001 and September 2001). Creating a mental model to underlie your systems thinking provides yet another opportunity for pro-active collaboration with hospital administration.

My 83 year-old father, an internist-gastroenterologist thinks all of this just might be hooey, so he lectures me, “Just take care of the patient, that’s what you’re there for.” But, then I point out to him that he always has liked to end our discussions by talking about how everything is connected to everything else, “The head bone’s connected to the foot bone.” I’ve heard from him since I was in grade school. The systems in our hospitals and emergency departments are connected, too. Effectively improving seasonal overcrowding requires broadening your view to include the rest of the hospital, the EMS system and perhaps the community’s facilities for primary care. Be a systems thinker—think of them all together.

March 15, 2002 in Leadership | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834201e2153ef00d834240b4553ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Leadership Can Come out of Systems Thinking and Profound Knowledge.:

Comments

Thursday, May 16, 2002

Doctor Steven Davidson ('Leadership from Systems Thinking and Profound Knowledge', EMN, March 2002, p. 22) may admire and use the concepts of W. Edwards Deming, but his department's continuation of the practice of holding patients is at odds with the first of Deming's Fourteen Rules of Quality: Constancy of Purpose. EPs are supposed to get people out of the department by practicing the art and science of emergency medicine. A system that delays or prevents any part of the trio of "meet 'em, treat 'em, and street 'emergency medicine" (I can't think of an appropriate rhyme for admission) is one dedicated to frustration and failure.

The temporizing role that the modern emergency department plays in the new hospital environment has replaced the specialty's original goal. If we "just take care of the patient," as Dr. Davidson's father stated, then the problem is solved because I doubt that you could find anyone on the medical staff or in administration who could actually justify ED holds as being a desirable benefit to anyone.

Perhaps most departments should follow the advice of Stephen Covey from his Seven Habits of Highly Effective People: Begin with the end in mind.

Stephen C. Acosta, MD
Portland, OR

Posted by: Stephen C. Acosta, MD | Jan 4, 2004 4:14:05 PM

I’m not sure what Dr. Acosta is asking of me? In the March EMN I had tried to demonstrate the value of thinking beyond the narrow confines of the ED alone and the rather narrowly defined role of “meet ‘em, treat ‘em and street ‘em.”

What would Dr. Acosta suggest? In his final sentence he implies that the ED should begin with his end in mind, but I’ve not seen that description of the emergency physician’s role anywhere in the materials published by emergency medicine professional or academic societies. Rather, I see statements about responsiveness to community and individual patient needs for access and direct care and the current capacity challenge we all confront.

Resources in hospitals are constrained and patient demand is growing. Capacity problems are legion and the current nationwide crisis has been acknowledged in the popular press.

So, although I agree with Dr. Acosta that few if any would find “ED holds” desirable, what does he propose? Closing our doors? Pushing patients into the street? Putting two patients in a bed (as is commonly done in parts of Asia and Africa where resources are scarce)?

I doubt that individual action, confined to the ED, by emergency physicians will change anything. Thus, I adhere to my column’s theme of “system thinking.” By engaging across the totality of the hospital’s function, emergency physicians have an opportunity to mitigate—though perhaps not solve—the capacity challenge in our departments, thereby better serving our patients and communities.

Posted by: Steven J. Davidson, MD | Jan 4, 2004 4:15:20 PM

Post a comment